Reduce our carbon footprint by decreasing the amount of CO2 - In a stroke of sheer brilliance, The journal of unlikely science, weird science Null Hypothesis has cracked the climate change problem. Less than a month into...
Categories

Arts & Entertainment (5137)
Business (18037)
Career (3249)
Cars and Trucks (2671)
Celebrities (0)
Communications (456)
Computers (3580)
Culture and Society (9420)
Disease & Illness (1898)
Environment (842)
Fashion (2694)
Finance (16321)
Food & Beverage (574)
Health & Fitness (13716)
Hobbies (2656)
Home & Family (6471)
Inspirational (0)
Internet Business (10547)
Legal (97)
Pets & Animals (7)
Politics (304)
Product Reviews (0)
Recreation & Sports (7673)
Reference & Education (4284)
Religion (803)
Self Improvement (1501)
Travel & Leisure (3892)
Vehicles (472)
Womens Issues (0)
Writing & Speaking (1158)
 
Stats
Total Articles: 118644
Total Authors: 6242
Total Downloads: 1608024


Newest Member
Isabel Searie
 

   

Reduce our carbon footprint by decreasing the amount of CO2



In a stroke of sheer brilliance, The journal of , Null Hypothesis has cracked the climate change problem.
Less than a month into Richard Branson’s five-year competition, Null
Hypothesis will take its winning idea to Virgin Earth and walk away
with a cool $25 million.

The solution to Branson’s problem (not to mention our, global, problem)
is closer to hand than we could ever have imagined. It is, quite
simply, stop breathing; or at least breathe less.

The average person takes 24,000 breaths a day, breathing in
approximately 6g of carbon dioxide, but breathing out around 800g
during the same time. Over a year, you personally will add a net 290kg
of CO2 to the atmosphere, just by exhaling. Multiply that by a global
population of 6.5 billion and it adds up to a criminal 1.88 gigatonnes.

If we each merely cut out one breath in three, we could decrease the
amount of CO2 entering the atmosphere each year by a staggering 0.63
gigatonnes. That’s 0.63 billion tonnes - the same effect as saving 5
million acres of land (an area the size of Wales) from deforestation,
or recycling 192 million tonnes of waste instead of trashing it.

But we don’t want to stop there. Let’s get really ruthless.

Perhaps the most carbon efficient solution would be to eliminate those
members of the population taking the most breaths and therefore
expelling the most carbon dioxide.

Intuitively, you might expect these to be the sorts of idle layabouts
who wouldn’t know what a treadmill was if it hit them in the face. With
their high resting heart rates and shallow, wheezing breaths, they must
be the least environmentally sound.

But that’s not the case. Being as there is no obvious difference
between the metabolic rates of the honed and toned, and the squashy and
sluggish, we all burn about the same amount of carbon whilst resting.
However, all that time that the super-fitties among us spend
exercising, they’re guzzling extra oxygen and belching out tonnes of
CO2.

When we undertake strenuous exercise our metabolic rate tends to
increase by at least 50%. So during a 30-minute bout, we could be
expelling an extra 8.3g of carbon dioxide.

Perhaps that doesn’t seem like much, but by our calculations, if we
exercised as we were supposed to – about 30 minutes, five times a week
– this would add up to another 1.3kg a year. Across the world
population, that’s a lung-busting 14 million tonnes of extra CO2 every
year.

And just to make matters worse, your body continues to metabolise at a
higher rate long after you cease exercising, pumping out increased
levels of carbon dioxide for anything up to 36 hours.

Doctors Impey and Steer prepare to win the big prize in the Virgin
Earth Challenge.

Doctors Impey and Steer get into training to receive their big winnings

So the key to reversing climate change and saving the planet is simple:
do nothing. Absolutely nothing. In an ideal world, we’d all just sit
around keeping our breathing rates as low as possible, skipping the odd
breath here and there just to help matters along. That way we’d all be
.

And there’s an extra benefit to the global atmosphere.

As our enforced lethargy leads us to pile on the pounds, we’ll act as
carbon sinks – tying up potentially dangerous atmospheric carbon (via
plants and hopefully an animal or two) as ever-so-becoming fat deposits.

But, before you revel in the excuse to leave your trainers to gather
dust, the amount of carbon dioxide you would save by not exercising is
nothing compared to what you’d save by running somewhere instead of
driving.

And one final thought: even if CO2 levels were to be stabilised
quickly, global temperatures would continue to soar for years to come.
So, even though we’ve helped solve Branson’s challenge, in terms of
seeing an – don’t hold your breath.

Article Source: FeedRat.com
By : Null Hypothesis

Author Null Hypothesis:

Null Hypothesis, The journal of unlikely science,href="http://www.null-hypothesis.co.uk">wierd science, href="http://www.null-hypothesis.co.uk">strange science has
cracked Richard Branson's climate change earth challenge to reduce the carbon footprint.

Note: by reading this article you agree to our terms and conditions
use for informational purposes only


[Valid RSS feed] Subscribe to RSS feed for this category articles


republish article Click here to copy and publish this article




New Members
select
Sign up
select
learn more
 
Nav Menu
Home
Login
Submit Articles
Terms and Conditions
Top Articles
About Us
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
RSS Feeds

Actions
Print This Article
Add To Favorites